In America, do religious differences matter less today than in the past? Yes, writes Mike Oppenheimer in his Beliefs column today [1], citing at least the Latino community’s widening acceptance of people with dual religious identities. Case in point is Florida’s senator-elect Marc Rubio. While self-described as a practicing Catholic, in his campaign, Mr. Rubio has regularly attended evangelical services at Christ Fellowship, which is affiliated with the Southern Baptist Convention.
It may be true that some religious institutions impose less stringent restrictions with regards their followers dabbling into practices of other faiths. A Buddhist friend of mine attests that it is not a “sin” for her go to Christian Sunday “worship” as she does. However, Mr. Oppenheimer points out that Protestants and Catholics have important elements in their creeds that are simply at odds with each other, such as the authority of the pope and the meaning of Holy Communion.
Critics say Marc Rubio was simply courting to both Catholic and Protestant voters in the last elections. I disagree with his politics but, as it seems, Mr. Rubio has found a very good niche. He has targeted a growing number of Hispanics who may view religious identity to be less important a criterion in casting their ballot.
Does this mean Americans are finally putting to heart the oft-misunderstood concept of separation of church and state? [2] Maybe not! One aspiring presidential candidate does not even know that such an amendment exists. Many in fact believe the religious beliefs of some are quite at odds with the American way of life. And, there are those out there who would swear--to God, perhaps--that President Obama is a Muslim? [3]
[1] Mike Oppenheimer, “Marc Rubio: Catholic or Protestant”, The New York Times, Nov. 27, 2010
[2] religioustolerance.org
[3] brookings.com
Comments